Accident At Work

She she be sacked ( fired ) ?

I found out last night that a friend of mine recently needed to get the morning after pill . She went into Boots ( a UK Pharmacy and shop ) at 15.40hrs approx’ and went to the counter . There was only one person working the pharmacy and she was a Pakistani Muslim . She refused to serve my friend on the grounds that it is against her religion to sell the morning after pill . This meant my friend had less than twenty minutes to get ten miles to the next Boots ( as they all shut at 16.00hrs on a Sunday , which it was ) .
Personally I don’t care what your religious views are , if you take a job then you have to do that job . I believe that this woman should be sacked and prosecuted for a failure to provide a duty of care and possible for religious bigotry and racism .
I believe my friend has a valid case for a compensation claim against Boots for dereliction of duty , stress caused , travel expenses , and employing an unsuitable employee .

What do you think ?
This is true . I’m not a troll .
rabhimself2 ; Sounds like you’ve been brain washed to me .
Italianissssima ; This wasn’t a young girl making a mistake it was a fully grown woman , qualified phamacist that was making an issue out of her religion at the expence of others . In essence denying the puplic their rights in an act of religious/racist bigotory .
I’ve read the link and the pharmacy society should be utterly ashamed of themselves .

Yet another example of PC bullsh!t gone mad .
Affy ; They’re easy to sopt if you’ve got any sort of knowlage .

More to the point , we’ve established that she was legally within her rights to refuse to serve the morning after pill . This law is clearly wrong and should be changed immediatly , in my opimion . But the point is was she morally within her rights ? I believe no she was not . This is the 21st century , we should be going forward not allowing certain groups to drag us back to the dark ages simply because of their backward medievil religions ( I include all religion in that statement ) .

What inspire you “state sovereignty” to refuse the two Holocaust survivors K.J Goldstein and P. Gingold

The two Holocaust survivors suing the US government and the Bush family for a total of $40bn in compensation claim both materially benefited from Auschwitz slave labour during the second world war.

Kurt Julius Goldstein, 87, and Peter Gingold, 85, began a class action in America in 2001, but the case was thrown out by Judge Rosemary Collier on the grounds that the government cannot be held liable under the principle of “state sovereignty”.
——————————————————————————–

“the state sovereignty” what pretty notion to excuse Bush dinasty sovereign and monarch, isn’t ?
In France we had the Papon process, why not the Bush process ? An historical anomaly, isn’t it ?

What do think about a rehearing process in 2008 ?
Now we know “the base” “al qaeda” is Bush family !

Here the link to the guardian paper http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar

White lining on your side of the road – legal or not?

Overtaking a static queue of cars on a motorbike, taking into account that solid white lines must not be crossed (with the usual exceptions), if you are on “your” side of the road i.e. keeping left of the centre line (UK) do you still have right of way over cars pulling out from driveways on the nearside, turning across you?

This is a personal question as I did get wiped out doing this years ago and only got 50/50 on my compensation claim, but I still white line every day (but a bit more carefully these days).

What do you think?
Edit; – yes, I got your interest – so what is it, legal or not? As long as I’m on MY side of the line? Does the line mean “No overtaking” or does it mean “Do not cross”. I’m not crossing the line, but I am overtaking.